Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
PDF best practices: to get them indexed or not? Do they pass SEO value to the site?
-
All PDFs have landing pages, and the pages are already indexed. If we allow the PDFs to get indexed, then they'd be downloadable directly from google's results page and we would not get GA events.
The PDFs info would somewhat overlap with the landing pages info. Also, if we ever need to move content, we'd now have to redirects the links to the PDFs.
What are best practices in this area? To index or not?
What do you / your clients do and why?
Would a PDF indexed by google and downloaded directly via a link in the SER page pass SEO juice to the domain? What if it's on a subdomain, like when hosted by Pardot? (www1.example.com)
-
repeatedly noticed that google index PDF files. But only their headers, without the contents of the file itself.
If you format the file description correctly, you can do it through the PDF Architect (http://pdf-architect.ideaprog.download/) program, or any other convenient for you.
-
PDFs can be canonicalized using .htaccess. Google is usually very slow to discover and obey this but it can be done. However, if your PDF is not close to being an exact copy of the target page, Google will probably not honor the canonicalization and they will index the PDF and the html page separately.
PDFs can be optimized (given a title tag) by editing the properties of the document. Most PDF - making software has the ability to do this.
You can insert "buy buttons" and advertising in PDFs. Just make an image, paste it into the document and link it to your shopping cart or to your target document.
PDFs accumulate linkjuice and pass it to other documents.
Use the same strategies with PDFs as you would with an html page for directing visitors where you want them to go and getting them to do what you want them to do.
Some people will link to your PDF, others will grab your PDF and place it on their website (in that situation, you lose the canonical but still get juice from any embeded links), and benefit from ads and buttons that might be included. Lock the PFD with your PDF-creating software to prevent people from editing your PDF (but they can always copy/paste to get around it).
Other types of documents such as Excel spreadsheets, PowerPoint documents, Google images, etc can have embedded text, embedded links and other features that are close to equivalent to an html document.
-
PDF documents aren't written in HTML so you can't put canonical tags into PDFs. So that won't help or work. In-fact, if you are considering any types of tags of any kind for your PDFs, stop - because PDF files cannot have HTML tags embedded within them
If your PDF files have landing pages, just let those rank and let people download the actual PDF files from there if they chose to do so. In reality, it's best to convert all your PDFs to HTML and then give a download link to the PDF file in case people need it (in this day and age though, PDF is a backwards format. It's not even responsive, for people's pones - it sucks!)
The only canonical tags you could apply, would be on the landing pages (which do support HTML) pointing to the PDF files. Don't do that though, it's silly. Just convert the PDFs to HTML, then leave a download button for the old PDFs in-case anyone absolutely needs them. If the PDF and the HTML page contain similar info, it won't affect you very much.
What will affect you, is putting canonical tags on the landing pages thus making them non-canonical (and stopping the landing pages from ranking properly). You're in a situation where a perfect outcome isn't possible, but that's no reason to pick the worst outcome by 'over-adhering' to Google's guidelines. Sometimes people use Google's guidelines in ways Google didn't anticipate that they would
PDF documents don't usually pass PageRank at all, as far as I know
If you want to optimise the PDF documents themselves, the document title which you save them with is used in place of a <title>tag (which, since PDFs aren't in HTML, they can't use <title>). You can kind of optimise PDF documents by editing their document titles, but it's not super effective and in the end HTML conversions usually perform much better. As stated, for the old fossils who still like / need PDF, you can give them a download link</p> <p>In the case of downloadable PDF files with similar content to their connected landing pages, Google honestly don't care too much at all. Don't go nutty with canonical tags, don't stop your landing pages from ranking by making them non-canonical</p></title>
-
Yes, the PDFs would help increase your domain rank as they are practically considered as pages by Google, as explained in their QnA here.
Regarding hosting the PDFs on a subdomain, Google has stated that it's almost the same as having them on a subfolder, but that is highly contested by everyone since it's much harder to rank a subdomain than a subfolder.
Regarding the canonical tags, they are created for "Similar or Duplicate Pages", so the content doesn't have to be identical, and you'll be good so long as most of the content is the same. Otherwise, you can safely have them both be and have backlinks linking from the pdf to the main content to transfer "link juice", as they are considered as valid links.
I hope my response was beneficial to you and that the included proof was substantial.
Daniel Rika
-
Thank you.
Could you address my question about what's best practice? What do most companies do?
I am not sure what the best choice would be for us -- to expose PDFs which compete with their own landing pages or not.
Also, do you know if PDFs pass SEO "juice" to the main domain? Even if they are hosted at www2.maindomain.com?
Where can I see some proof that this is the case?
If the PDFs have a canonical tag pointing to the parent page, wouldn't this be confusing for the search engines as these are two separate files with differing content? Canonical tags are usually used to eliminate duplicates for differing URLs with identical content.
-
Whether you want to index the pdf directly or not will mostly depend on the content of the pdf:
- If you are using the pdf as a way to gather e-mails for your newsletter, or if you are offering the pdf as a way to get users to your site, then it would be best not to have them indexed directly, but instead have the users go to your site first.
- If the pdf in itself is a way for you to promote your website or content then you can index it so that it can be accessed directly and may help you to get a bit more rank or clicks.
If you are looking to track pdf views, there are options to connect GA and track your pdf views, such as this plugin.
If the content is similar to the web page, then you can put a canonical tag to transfer the ranking. You can add it to the http header using the .htaccess file as explained here.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is there a tool to check the SEO performance of articles from different websites?
Is there a tool to check the SEO performance of articles(like 100+ articles) from different websites in one place? I am looking for a tool where I can put several URLs of the articles we have published in bulk for many of our clients, and it can show me how those articles are performing. This way, we can check the performance of these articles at any time; there is no need to add URLs every time.
Reporting & Analytics | | Foxxr0 -
Best way to manage multiple (+100) analytics accounts as a marketing agency?
As marketing agency we have for each client an analytics account. This means that we have more than 100 analytics accounts. Because there is a limit of 100 analytics accounts (free version), we have created multiple accounts that own different analytics accounts of our clients. Is it possible to use [email protected] and add it to each of our multiple analytics accounts as manager or is there a limit too? In other words, how many accounts can you manage as 'manager'?
Reporting & Analytics | | conversal1 -
Should Google Trends Match Organic Traffic to My Site?
When looking at Google Trends and my Organic Traffic (using GA) as percentages of their total yearly values I have a correlation of .47. This correlation doesn't seem right when you consider that Google Trends (which is showing relative search traffic data) should match up pretty strongly to your Organic Traffic. Any thoughts on what might be going on? Why isn't Google Trends correlating with Organic Traffic? Shouldn't they be pulling from the same data set? Thanks, Jacob
Reporting & Analytics | | jacob.young.cricut0 -
Sudden Increase In Number of Pages Indexed By Google Webmaster When No New Pages Added
Greetings MOZ Community: On June 14th Google Webmaster tools indicated an increase in the number of indexed pages, going from 676 to 851 pages. New pages had been added to the domain in the previous month. The number of pages blocked by robots increased at that time from 332 (June 1st) to 551 June 22nd), yet the number of indexed pages still increased to 851. The following changes occurred between June 5th and June 15th: -A new redesigned version of the site was launched on June 4th, with some links to social media and blog removed on some pages, but with no new URLs added. The design platform was and is Wordpress. -Google GTM code was added to the site. -An exception was made by our hosting company to ModSecurity on our server (for i-frames) to allow GTM to function. In the last ten days my web traffic has decline about 15%, however the quality of traffic has declined enormously and the number of new inquiries we get is off by around 65%. Click through rates have declined from about 2.55 pages to about 2 pages. Obviously this is not a good situation. My SEO provider, a reputable firm endorsed by MOZ, believes the extra 175 pages indexed by Google, pages that do not offer much content, may be causing the ranking decline. My developer is examining the issue. They think there may be some tie in with the installation of GTM. They are noticing an additional issue, the sites Contact Us form will not work if the GTM script is enabled. They find it curious that both issues occurred around the same time. Our domain is www.nyc-officespace-leader. Does anyone have any idea why these extra pages are appearing and how they can be removed? Anyone have experience with GTM causing issues with this? Thanks everyone!!!
Reporting & Analytics | | Kingalan1
Alan1 -
Switch to www from non www preference negatively hit # pages indexed
I have a client whose site did not use the www preference but rather the non www form of the url. We were having trouble seeing some high quality inlinks and I wondered if the redirect to the non www site from the links was making it hard for us to track. After some reading, it seemed we should be using the www version for better SEO anyway so I made a change on Monday but had a major hit to the number of pages being indexed by Thursday. Freaking me out mildly. What are people's thoughts? I think I should roll back the www change asap - or am I jumping the gun?
Reporting & Analytics | | BrigitteMN0 -
Is it possible to use Google Tag Manager to pass a user’s text input into a form field to Google analytics?
Hey Everyone, I finally figured out how to use auto event tracking with Google Tag Manager, but didn't get the data I wanted. I want to see what users are typing into the search field on my site (the URL structure of my site isn't set up properly to use GA's built-in site search tracking). So, I set up the form submit event tracking in Google Tag Manager and used the following as my event tracking parameters: Category: Search Action: Search Value When I test and look in Google Analytics I just see: "search" and "search value." I wanted to see the text that I searched on my site. Not just the Action and Category of the event.... Is what I'm trying to do even possible? Do I need to set up a different event tracking parameter? Thanks everyone!
Reporting & Analytics | | DaveGuyMan0 -
Why is Google Analytics showing index.php after every page URL?
Hi, My client's site has GA tracking code gathering correct data on the site, but the pages are listed in GA as having /index.php at the end of every URL, although this does not appear when you visit the site pages. Even if there is a redirect happening for site visitors, shouldn't GA be showing the pages as their redirect destination, i.e. the URL that visitors actually see? Could this discrepancy be adversely affecting my search performance? Example page: http://freshstarttax.com/innocent-spouse/ shows up in GA as http://freshstarttax.com/innocent-spouse/index.php thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | JMagary0 -
Bing Won't Index Site - Help!
For the past few weeks I’ve been trying to figure out why my client's site is not indexed on bing and yahoo search engines. My Google analytics is telling me I’m getting traffic (very little traffic) from Bing almost daily but Bing webmaster tools is telling me I’ve received no traffic and no pages have been indexed into Bing since the beginning of December. At once point I was showing ranking in Bing for only one keyword then all of a sudden none of my pages were being indexed and I now rank for nothing for that website. From Google I’m getting over 1200 visits per month. I have been doing everything I can to possibly find the culprit behind this issue. I feel like the issue could be a redirect problem. In webmaster tools on Bing I’ve used “Fetch as Bingbot” and every time I use it I get a Status of “Redirection limit reached.”. I also checked the CRAWL Information and it’s saying all the URL’s to the site are under 301 redirect. A month or so ago the site was completely revamped and the canonical URL was changed from non www to www. I have tried manually adding pages to be indexed multiple times and Bing will not index any of the sites pages. I have submitted the sitemap to Bing and I am now at a loss. I don’t know what’s going on and why I can’t get the site listed on Bing. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,
Reporting & Analytics | | VITALBGS
Stephen0