Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Keep the blog separate or incorporate into main domain?
-
So my organization currently has both a main site and on a separate domain and separate host a wordpress blog. (our own domain not a wordpress.com)
the content posted on this blog is local, community driven, and related to our business but it is not used in anyway as a "sales" tool. It's more for interaction purposes with members and employees.
This blog has a lot of content and is updated with new posts very often. (generate traffic from a pretty wide variety of searches some related some not) My plan has been to 301 the old domain and move the wordpress blog over to our root domain in a subdirectory such as oursite.com/blog.
Does anyone have tips for moving a blog over like this? I'm concerned about any link juice it has dropping off and since it does provide some links to our root site currently (since it's basically a separate site). Basically i'm wondering if it'll be worth the effort or if i should just keep it separate and focus on other content gen strategies.
-
great input and much appreciated.
Ideally i would like to have the blog moved over, but there is a lot of links/content to deal with. I'm working on developing several content gen strategies, and wanted to make the blog a part of that. Currently it's always been more a part of the social media efforts, but work has been done to better connect it to the main site and make sure it's branded to be one in the same.
Where i'm a little unclear is the tech efforts of doing this. I would assume as thomas mentioned it's a matter of creating the subfolder to house the wordpress install/content and setting up a 301 on the old domain, but the need to do each post individually is where my concern is.
-
Absolutely! This is probably a priority project in my eyes if you are serious about building this up and going in the right direction now.
Moving the BLOG to your domain.com will not only improve the relation to your site and content, but brand it as well. Having the BLOG on another domain (as it is now) might help you from a link building perspective (more than likely not helping very much) due to the fact Google would know you own that domain, and perhaps place less emphasis on the inbound links to the main site.
First - setup your site/domain to host the BLOG as you mentioned. www.domain.com/blog. There are a few reasons for this.
1. It will allow you to reap the rewards of the content you build (supporting your site/company/mission) and support the main domain, and it's
2. The content you build, share and move into the social sphere and space will allow for inbound links to be shared across the entire site/domain. (don't build it into a sub-domain like blog.domain.com as this is considered to be a completely separate domain and won't pass any link value and juice across the domain). sub-domains are considered to be domains by themselves in the eyes of a search engine like Google.
3. The content you build (and load daily to the BLOG) will keep search spiders coming back for more
4. Keeping the BOG content on the main domain, allows you to share the content of the BLOG to your web visitors who might be searching via BRAND or specific, helping associate the brand with the content marketing resource you are building. This in itself is a gold-mine, as it will also act as another source for long-tail traffic opportunity, but you'll have to do your due diligence on this from a research perspective to capitalize on the traffic.
5. Content marketing is going to be BIG (as it's already on the rise and exploding now). This will all fall under your efforts for the BLOG and should be focused on. The value here is that over time, Google will begin to apply TRUST and AUTHORITY factors to the content you write and submit - helping to support your brand as a quality resource of shared information for people.
Make sure to use rel=canonical from the old location URL's and point those over to the new URL's on the domain.com/blog listing. Also make sure to use rel=author for each of the articles on the new blog from a META position.
NOTE: Handling a migration such as this is very complex (especially if the BLOG is extremely large with thousands, or 10's of thousands of posts and articles). Even a few hundred can be TRICKY!
Not only do you have to setup the files (BLOG) on the new domain, but you will have to write and execute 301's for every single article on the old location/domain and point that over to the new one. Some CMS's like Drupal can assist with this if your programmers can handle writing the scripts. This is a very technical undertaking, so make sure to do your research. If it's a small resource, you can still follow the same protocols, but it will take much less time to complete.
I recently handled and oversaw a technical project like this months back that took quite a long time to do, troubleshoot as it had over 30K articles and 25K in image files over the past 6 years! It was a huge undertaking that went extremely well, but you have to be patient.
Hope this helps some! There's probably a little more I didn't mention as I'm late for a meeting with a client!, so if you have questions - let me know!
Rob
-
I've got a separate blog site. There are benefits to both scenarios. The reason I have chosen to keep them separate is so that I can post content from other bloggers and contributors and not worry about the content being officially endorsed by Bulwark.
If you do move it over to your main site, you can easily export the wordpress site and all it's content to a sub-folder and then do a 301 redirect rule from your old blog. It is probably ideal to have them all on one site so long as the company wants to take claim for all the content written there.
-
I would say it's worth the effort to give your main site a boost. IMO the more content you can get on your own site that's relevant, the more Google has to base it's evaluation off you. If your blog has alot of fresh content, that'll keep Google coming back for more!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We switched the domain from www.blog.domain.com to domain.com/blog.
We switched the domain from www.blog.domain.com to domain.com/blog. This was done with the purpose of gaining backlinks to our main website as well along with to our blog. This set us very low in organic traffic and not to mention, lost the backlinks. For anything, they are being redirected to 301 code. Kindly suggest changes to bring back all the traffic.
Technical SEO | | arun.negi0 -
Reviews on Product Page or Separated
Good Afternoon We currently have our individual product information pages set-up with a link through to a separate review page optimised for the term "Product A Reviews" I was reading about structured data and if I read correctly, the reviews should sit with the marked up product data so I was wondering whether to merge them back into one page. We have many reviews so the review pages are paginated in blocks of 25 My options are: Leave as it is, product info page and separate review page Merge the review content back in to the main page and have the pagination work on that page Include the first 25 reviews on the product info page then when user clicks through to page 2, 3 etc they're taken to the separated review page. In that way the product page would regularly get new content and we can still have a page specifically targeted for reviews. From the users point of view, they probably aren't even aware they're being taken to a separate reviews page so with that in mind as I'm typing this maybe they should be one page again
Technical SEO | | Ham19790 -
Correct linking to the /index of a site and subfolders: what's the best practice? link to: domain.com/ or domain.com/index.html ?
Dear all, starting with my .htaccess file: RewriteEngine On
Technical SEO | | inlinear
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.inlinear.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://inlinear.com/$1 [R=301,L] RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^./index.html
RewriteRule ^(.)index.html$ http://inlinear.com/ [R=301,L] 1. I redirect all URL-requests with www. to the non www-version...
2. all requests with "index.html" will be redirected to "domain.com/" My questions are: A) When linking from a page to my frontpage (home) the best practice is?: "http://domain.com/" the best and NOT: "http://domain.com/index.php" B) When linking to the index of a subfolder "http://domain.com/products/index.php" I should link also to: "http://domain.com/products/" and not put also the index.php..., right? C) When I define the canonical ULR, should I also define it just: "http://domain.com/products/" or in this case I should link to the definite file: "http://domain.com/products**/index.php**" Is A) B) the best practice? and C) ? Thanks for all replies! 🙂
Holger0 -
Approved Word Separators in URLs
Hi There, We are in the process of revamping our URL structure and my devs tell me they have a technical problem using a hyphen as a word separator. There's a whole lot of competing recommendations out there and at this point I'm just confused. Does anyone have any idea what character would be next-best to the hyphen for separating words in a URL? Any reason to prefer one over another? Some links I've found discussing the topic: This page says that "__Google has confirmed that the point (.), the comma (,) and the hyphen (-) are valid word separators in URL’s.": http://www.internetofficer.com/seo/google-word-separator/ This page suggests the plus (+) symbol would be best: http://labs.phurix.net/posts/word-separators-in-urls This guy says he's tested and there's a whole bunch of symbols that will work as word separators: http://www.webproguide.com/articles/Symbols-as-word-separators-a-look-inside-the-search-engine-logic/ I'm leaning towards the tilde (~) or the plus (+) sign. Usage would be like so: http://www.domain.com/shop/sterling~silver OR /shop/sterling+silver etc... Thanks in advance for your help!
Technical SEO | | Richline_Digital1 -
Domains
My questions is what to do with old domains we own from a past business. Is it advantages to direct them to the new domain/company or is that going to cause a problem for the new company. They are not in the same industry.
Technical SEO | | KeylimeSocial0 -
Blog post summary pages
I'm wondering post-panda if its wise to block access to blog post summary pages like this one: http://www.howtotradestocks.org/blog/page/15/ Any thoughts?
Technical SEO | | PeterM220 -
Subdomain and Domain Rankings
I have read here that domain names with keywords might add a boost to your search rank For instance using a completely inane example monkey-fights.com might get a boost compared to mfl.com (monkey fighting league) when searching for "monkey fights" There seems to be a hot debate as to how much bonus the first domain might get over the second, but leaving that aside for the moment. Question 1. Would monkey-fights.mfl.com get the same kind of bonus as a root domain bonus? Question 2. If the answer to 1 above was yes would a 301 redirect from the suddomain URL to root domain URL retain that bonus I was just thinking on how hard it is to get root domains these days that are not either being squatted on etc. and if this might be a way to get the same bonus, or maybe subdomains are less bonus prone and so it would be a waste of time Thanks
Technical SEO | | bThere0 -
Block a sub-domain from being indexed
This is a pretty quick and simple (i'm hoping) question. What is the best way to completely block a sub domain from getting indexed from all search engines? One item i cannot use is the meta "no follow" tag. Thanks! - Kyle
Technical SEO | | kchandler0